I am sorry but I just can’t leave the sodomites alone. I have openly declared that I am a fan of sodomy story (please do not interpret this as I am a sodomite; I am referring to the Anwar Sodomy Case II), and therefore how can I not write something about it from time to time?
Before we go any further, let’s see what the definition of “sodomy” is:
- intercourse via the anus, committed by a man with a man or woman
- anal copulation by a man inserting his penis in the anus either of another man or a woman
(Source from Google)
This is not a porn site and we are discussing about the act of sodomy from the medical and academic point of view. However, if you find this topic disgusting, please stop reading.
Based on the above definitions, we can safely draw a conclusion that, in order to accuse someone of sodomizing another, you must, at least, prove that:
(a) the “sodomizer” is a male with penis (I know you will say this is a stupid statement ,as all males are born with a penis. I don’t want to argue with you but I would strongly advise you to pay a visit to Chow Kit Road or Jalan Goh Hock Huat, Klang, and then tell me whether you are still 100% sure that all males are attached with a penis); and
(b) the “sodomizer” must insert (also known as “penetrate”) his penis in the anus of another human being (this human being can be either a girl or a boy, as all human beings are given an anus).
Ok, now, will you believe me if I were to tell you that someone is capable of sodomizing another fellow human being without inserting his penis in that human being’s anus?
Remember I talked about the magic show performed by our government in demolishing buildings as big as a 50,000-capacity stadium without the assistance of any explosive or external device? I honestly thought that our government is already a great magician. After all, who on earth can collapse a one-year-old building in broad daylight without explosives?
Anyway, I recently found another magician who can perform even better tricks. He is none other than our PKR advisor, Anwar. What can he do?
Read this report. According to the medical report of Hospital Kuala Lumpur, which was endorsed by 3 specialists, there was no evidence of penetration on Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan – the complainant who was allegedly sodomized by Anwar.
Wow, even if the anus of Mohd Saiful was never penetrated, he could nevertheless still “feel the pain in the ass” and accuse Anwar of doing such an indecent act on him. To fortify his accusation, he even swore on the holy book. I don’t know if Mohd Saiful is telling the truth, but if he is, then I must present a certificate to Anwar, certifying that he is the best magician on earth.
If Mohd Saiful is telling the truth and Anwar gets convicted and sent to jail despite documentary evidence showing that Saiful’s anus was never penetrated, what does that mean? The only conclusion I can make is – Anwar is able to penetrate someone’s back without actually penetrating someone’s back. Does that make sense to you?
Well, I suppose in this bolehland we share the same motto with Adidas - impossible is nothing.
Before we go any further, let’s see what the definition of “sodomy” is:
- intercourse via the anus, committed by a man with a man or woman
- anal copulation by a man inserting his penis in the anus either of another man or a woman
(Source from Google)
This is not a porn site and we are discussing about the act of sodomy from the medical and academic point of view. However, if you find this topic disgusting, please stop reading.
Based on the above definitions, we can safely draw a conclusion that, in order to accuse someone of sodomizing another, you must, at least, prove that:
(a) the “sodomizer” is a male with penis (I know you will say this is a stupid statement ,as all males are born with a penis. I don’t want to argue with you but I would strongly advise you to pay a visit to Chow Kit Road or Jalan Goh Hock Huat, Klang, and then tell me whether you are still 100% sure that all males are attached with a penis); and
(b) the “sodomizer” must insert (also known as “penetrate”) his penis in the anus of another human being (this human being can be either a girl or a boy, as all human beings are given an anus).
Ok, now, will you believe me if I were to tell you that someone is capable of sodomizing another fellow human being without inserting his penis in that human being’s anus?
Remember I talked about the magic show performed by our government in demolishing buildings as big as a 50,000-capacity stadium without the assistance of any explosive or external device? I honestly thought that our government is already a great magician. After all, who on earth can collapse a one-year-old building in broad daylight without explosives?
Anyway, I recently found another magician who can perform even better tricks. He is none other than our PKR advisor, Anwar. What can he do?
Read this report. According to the medical report of Hospital Kuala Lumpur, which was endorsed by 3 specialists, there was no evidence of penetration on Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan – the complainant who was allegedly sodomized by Anwar.
Wow, even if the anus of Mohd Saiful was never penetrated, he could nevertheless still “feel the pain in the ass” and accuse Anwar of doing such an indecent act on him. To fortify his accusation, he even swore on the holy book. I don’t know if Mohd Saiful is telling the truth, but if he is, then I must present a certificate to Anwar, certifying that he is the best magician on earth.
If Mohd Saiful is telling the truth and Anwar gets convicted and sent to jail despite documentary evidence showing that Saiful’s anus was never penetrated, what does that mean? The only conclusion I can make is – Anwar is able to penetrate someone’s back without actually penetrating someone’s back. Does that make sense to you?
Well, I suppose in this bolehland we share the same motto with Adidas - impossible is nothing.
Malaysia is a world full of fantasies!!more surprises r coming!!
ReplyDelete